JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 7, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impedimento Del Procurador General De La Nacion
  • Causal consistente en tener interés en la decisión
Impedimento En Proceso De Constitucionalidad
  • Causales de magistrados y conjueces son aplicables al Procurador General de la Nación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se acepta el impedimento manifestado por el Procurador General de la Nación, para emitir concepto dentro del expediente de la referencia.

El argumento del Jefe del Ministerio Público fue el tener interés directo en la decisión que profiera la Corte frente a la norma acusada, por tratarse de una disposición que lo faculta para nombrar a 218 funcionarios en cargos de libre nombramiento y remoción, cuyo estrecho grado de confianza implica un margen razonable de discrecionalidad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ACEPTAR, con base en las razones expresadas en esta providencia, el impedimento manifestado por el Procurador General de la Nacion para emitir concepto dentro del expediente D-12856.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional que levante la suspension de terminos decretada en el proceso de la referencia con ocasion del impedimento propuesto y corra traslado por el termino que falte a la Viceprocuradora General de la Nacion, para que rinda el concepto de que tratan los articulos 242-2 y 278-5 de la Constitucion Politica.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.